Long Guts
Description
Buying an in-the-money call and an in-the-money put, a more expensive, higher-floor cousin of the long strangle built entirely from in-the-money strikes.
Setup
- Buy one in-the-money call, struck below the current price.
- Buy one in-the-money put, struck above the current price, same expiry.
Context
Used like a long strangle, for an expected big move in either direction, when the trader wants more built-in intrinsic value and is willing to pay more for it.
Risk Profile
Maximum loss is the combined premium paid, minus the intrinsic value already built into both strikes at entry, realized if the underlying finishes between the two strikes. Gain is unlimited on a large enough move in either direction.
Pros
- More intrinsic value cushion than a strangle built from out-of-the-money strikes.
- Profits from a big move regardless of direction.
- Narrower time-value component than a straddle at the same strikes distance.
Cons
- Much higher cost of entry than a comparable strangle.
- Ties up significantly more capital for a similar payoff shape.
Effect of Time
Time decay works against the position, though a smaller share of the premium is pure time value compared to an out-of-the-money strangle.
Effect of Volatility
A rise in implied volatility benefits both legs.
Look-Alike Strategies
Live Structure
| Position? | Right? | Ratio | Strike | Expiry | IV? | Premium? | Fill Price? | Liquidity? | Est. Fee? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long | Call | 1 | $74000.0000 | 20 Nov 2026 | 39.2% | $2512.5214 | $2550.0218 | 36.4000 | $22.5002 |
| Long | Put | 1 | $76000.0000 | 20 Nov 2026 | 38.2% | $2475.0307 | $2512.5312 | 18.0000 | $22.5003 |
Net cost, breakevens, the payoff chart and the scenario table are after costs: every leg filled by crossing the spread, estimated fees included -- the same numbers the Scanner ranks by.
Estimated Cost to Assemble
An estimate of what entering this structure right now would really cost: filling every leg by crossing the spread (the ask when buying, the bid when selling) instead of at the mid-price, plus an estimated exchange fee. Real fees and fills can differ from this estimate.
Compare venues
These exact contracts -- same strikes, expiries and ratios -- on every venue BOSS tracks for this currency, at execution: what selling (bid) or buying (ask) each leg there comes to, after that venue's own fee. Green marks the best venue for each leg and for the whole structure.
| Deribit this page | Bybit | OKX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Index? | $74877.7500 | $74971.8621 | $74879.7000 |
| Mid-Price Cost | $4987.5521 | $4987.5000 | $4950.6179 |
| Slippage? | +$75.0008 | +$12.5000 | +$37.5047 |
| Estimated Fees? | +$45.0005 | +$45.0803 | +$45.0056 |
| Total Estimated Cost | $5107.5534 | $5045.0803$62.4700 better than this page | $5033.1282$74.4300 better than this page |
| Max Profit? | Uncapped | Uncapped | Uncapped |
| Max Loss? | -$3107.5534 | -$3045.0803 | -$3033.1282 |
| Breakeven(s)? | $70892.4466, $79107.5534 | $70954.9197, $79045.0803 | $70966.8718, $79033.1282 |
| Structure IV? | 38.7% | 38.4% | 38.4% |
| Open on this venue → | Open on this venue → |
Each leg: what it nets there per contract (fill price with the fee folded in), then the fill price, fee, IV and the size quoted at that price.
For comparing prices, not a recommendation: quotes move by the second, size is only what's shown at the top of the book, fees are each venue's published estimate, and the venues settle against different indexes and margin separately.
Market Context
This expiry as the Dashboard sees it: how the legs are priced against at-the-money and realized volatility, and where the expiry's forward sits against spot.
Volatility Smile?
Implied volatility across strikes at this expiry; the marked lines are this structure's strikes. Buying on the high part of the curve pays up for volatility; selling there collects it.
Leg bought Leg sold
Payoff & Greeks vs. Underlying Price
The Greeks curves are a Black-Scholes model using each leg's current implied volatility, holding time to expiry fixed -- not live exchange data at every price, which only exists at the current price (dashed line).
Payoff at Expiration
After costs At mid price
This structure's value and profit/loss at expiration, at a handful of specific prices: every leg's strike, every breakeven, the current spot, and the chart's own range.
| Underlying Price | Value at Expiration | Profit / Loss | Return on Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| $70892.4466 breakeven | $5107.5534 | $0.0000 | +0.0% |
| $72000.0000 | $4000.0000 | -$1107.5534 | -21.7% |
| $74000.0000 | $2000.0000 | -$3107.5534 | -60.8% |
| $75000.6400 current | $2000.0000 | -$3107.5534 | -60.8% |
| $76000.0000 | $2000.0000 | -$3107.5534 | -60.8% |
| $78000.0000 | $4000.0000 | -$1107.5534 | -21.7% |
| $79107.5534 breakeven | $5107.5534 | $0.0000 | +0.0% |
Delta (model)?
Gamma (model)?
Vega (model)?
Theta (model)?
Rho (model)?
Alternatives
From the Scanner's latest pass (21:31:48 UTC), priced at execution like everything above.
Same payoff through other strategies
| Strategy | Market | vs. this one | Credit/Debit | Max Profit? | Max Loss? | Prob. of Profit? | Max Profit / Max Loss? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long Strangle74000/76000 | Bybit · BTC | $72.4760 | $3035.0774 | Uncapped | -$3035.0774 | 41% | — |
| Long Strangle74000/76000 | OKX · BTC | $24.6357 | $3082.9177 | Uncapped | -$3082.9177 | 40% | — |
| Long Strangle74000/76000 | Deribit · BTC | -$12.4687 | $3120.0220 | Uncapped | -$3120.0220 | 40% | — |
Other strikes and widths of this strategy
None found in the latest scan.