Probability of profit (PoP)
Probability of profit is the estimated chance that a strategy ends with a gain at expiry, after its entry costs; BOSS computes it from a lognormal distribution around the expiry's forward at the at-the-money implied volatility.
How BOSS computes it
A strategy's payoff at expiry is a function of the settlement price. Its breakevens split the price axis into intervals where it either makes or loses money. Probability of profit (PoP) is the probability that the price lands in one of the profitable intervals. BOSS computes it the same way for every strategy:
- after costs: each leg is priced at execution, the ask when buying, the bid when selling, with its trading fee included, so the breakevens are the ones you actually face;
- lognormal around the forward: the settlement price follows a lognormal distribution whose mean is the expiry's forward, the same risk-neutral distribution the Black-76 model uses;
- at one volatility: the expiry's at-the-money implied volatility, flat across strikes.
It is therefore the probability the options market implies, not a forecast. A flat volatility ignores the skew: when out-of-the-money puts trade at higher IV, the market sees more downside than this PoP assumes.
A worked example
A 30-day short strangle on BTC, with the forward at $100,000 and IV at 50%: sell the $110,000 call for $2,275 and the $90,000 put for $1,828.
- At mid, the credit is $4,103 and the breakevens are $85,897 and $114,103. The lognormal probability of settling between them is 67.8%.
- At execution, selling at the bids (say $40 under the mid on each leg) and paying about $30 of fees per leg, the credit falls to $3,963 and PoP to 67.3%.
Two trades in three win. But the loss in the remaining third has no cap, so the result summary shows no reward-to-risk ratio for it.
Add wings to cap it, a short iron condor: also buy the $115,000 call for $1,341 and the $85,000 put for $847. The credit drops to $1,915, the maximum loss is $5,000 − $1,915 = $3,085, and PoP at mid falls to 59.6%. The reward-to-risk is $1,915 / $3,085 ≈ 0.62: win less than two times in three, make $1 for every $1.61 you can lose.
High PoP, poor reward-to-risk
Probability and payoff trade off against each other. A strategy that wins often wins small: short options far out of the money keep their premium most of the time and occasionally lose many times that premium. A long call far out of the money is the opposite: a low PoP and a large potential gain. Neither number alone says whether a trade is good. BOSS shows PoP next to maximum profit, maximum loss and reward-to-risk so the trade-off stays visible, and flags as lopsided a structure whose capped loss is many times what it can realistically make.
PoP is not expected value
Expected value weighs every outcome by its probability and size. Under the market's own distribution, an option priced at fair value has an expected value of about zero: for the strangle above at mid, the 67.8% of small gains and the 32.2% of larger losses cancel out. After costs the expected value is negative, about −$140 here, the spreads and fees paid. A positive edge needs a view that the market's distribution is wrong, for example that realized volatility will stay below implied, not a high PoP.
Live on BOSS
The full live block of a short strangle: its legs, assembly cost, payoff and scenarios, and the result summary with probability of profit, maximum profit and loss, and reward-to-risk, all after costs.
| Position? | Right? | Ratio | Strike | Expiry | IV? | Premium? | Fill Price? | Liquidity? | Est. Fee? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short | Call | 1 | $87000.0000 | 09 Oct 2026 | 33.0% | $1140.1563 | $1118.6439 | 16.8000 | $25.8149 |
| Short | Put | 1 | $85000.0000 | 09 Oct 2026 | 33.0% | $1075.6191 | $1032.5944 | 103.3000 | $25.8149 |
Net cost, breakevens, the payoff chart and the scenario table are after costs: every leg filled by crossing the spread, estimated fees included -- the same numbers the Scanner ranks by.
Estimated Cost to Assemble
An estimate of what entering this structure right now would really cost: filling every leg by crossing the spread (the ask when buying, the bid when selling) instead of at the mid-price, plus an estimated exchange fee. Real fees and fills can differ from this estimate.
Compare venues
These exact contracts -- same strikes, expiries and ratios -- on every venue BOSS tracks for this currency, at execution: what selling (bid) or buying (ask) each leg there comes to, after that venue's own fee. Green marks the best venue for each leg and for the whole structure.
| Deribit this page | Bybit | OKX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short Call $87000.0000 · 09 Oct 2026 | $1092.8290$1118.6439 − fee $25.8149 · IV 33.0% · 16.8000 | $1124.1578$1150.0000 − fee $25.8422 · IV 32.3% · 13.3900 | $1092.6040$1118.4136 − fee $25.8095 · IV 32.7% · 13.1300 |
| Short Put $85000.0000 · 09 Oct 2026 | $1006.7795$1032.5944 − fee $25.8149 · IV 33.0% · 103.3000 | $1064.1578$1090.0000 − fee $25.8422 · IV 33.5% · 19.3000 | $1049.5881$1075.3977 − fee $25.8095 · IV 32.7% · 79.4900 |
| Index? | $85968.8200 | $86001.4117 | $85976.8000 |
| Mid-Price Cost | -$2215.7754 | -$2247.5000 | -$2236.8272 |
| Slippage? | +$64.5371 | +$7.5000 | +$43.0159 |
| Estimated Fees? | +$51.6297 | +$51.6844 | +$51.6191 |
| Total Estimated Cost | -$2099.6085 | -$2188.3156$88.7100 better than this page | -$2142.1922$42.5800 better than this page |
| Max Profit? | $2099.6085 | $2188.3156 | $2142.1922 |
| Max Loss? | Uncapped | Uncapped | Uncapped |
| Breakeven(s)? | $82900.3915, $89099.6085 | $82811.6844, $89188.3156 | $82857.8078, $89142.1922 |
| Structure IV? | 33.0% | 32.9% | 32.7% |
| Open on this venue → | Open on this venue → |
Each leg: what it nets there per contract (fill price with the fee folded in), then the fill price, fee, IV and the size quoted at that price.
Cross-venue differences
No leg prices better on another venue than where the rest of the structure does: splitting it gains nothing.
| Contract | Best sale | Best purchase elsewhere | Difference | Size | IV spread (points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call $87000.0000 · 09 Oct 2026 | $1124.1578 Bybit | $1187.2390 OKX | -$63.0812 | 13.3900 | 0.7 Deribit 33.0% / Bybit 32.3% |
| Put $85000.0000 · 09 Oct 2026 | $1049.5881 OKX | $1120.8422 Bybit | -$71.2541 | 8.7100 | 0.8 Bybit 33.5% / OKX 32.7% |
For comparing prices, not a recommendation: quotes move by the second, size is only what's shown at the top of the book, fees are each venue's published estimate, and the venues settle against different indexes and margin separately.
Market Context
This expiry as the Dashboard sees it: how the legs are priced against at-the-money and realized volatility, and where the expiry's forward sits against spot.
Volatility Smile?
Implied volatility across strikes at this expiry; the marked lines are this structure's strikes. Buying on the high part of the curve pays up for volatility; selling there collects it.
Leg bought Leg sold
Payoff & Greeks vs. Underlying Price
The Greeks curves are a Black-Scholes model using each leg's current implied volatility, holding time to expiry fixed -- not live exchange data at every price, which only exists at the current price (dashed line).
Payoff at Expiration
After costs At mid price
This structure's value and profit/loss at expiration, at a handful of specific prices: every leg's strike, every breakeven, the current spot, and the chart's own range.
| Underlying Price | Value at Expiration | Profit / Loss | Return on Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| $82900.3915 breakeven | -$2099.6085 | $0.0000 | +0.0% |
| $83000.0000 | -$2000.0000 | $99.6085 | +4.7% |
| $85000.0000 | $0.0000 | $2099.6085 | +100.0% |
| $86050.4200 current | $0.0000 | $2099.6085 | +100.0% |
| $87000.0000 | $0.0000 | $2099.6085 | +100.0% |
| $89000.0000 | -$2000.0000 | $99.6085 | +4.7% |
| $89099.6085 breakeven | -$2099.6085 | $0.0000 | +0.0% |
Delta (model)?
Gamma (model)?
Vega (model)?
Theta (model)?
Rho (model)?
Common mistakes
- Reading PoP as expected value: a 90% chance of a small gain can come with a 10% chance of a much larger loss.
- Treating PoP as a forecast: it is the market's implied, risk-neutral probability at a flat volatility.
- Comparing PoP at mid prices: costs move the breakevens, and BOSS computes it after costs.
- Ignoring skew: with expensive downside puts, the market sees more downside than a flat-volatility PoP shows.
Where this shows up on BOSS
Educational content, not investment advice. See the disclaimer.