Bear Put Spread
Description
Buying a higher-strike put and selling a lower-strike put in the same expiry, trading away extra downside for a lower cost of entry.
Setup
- Buy one put at a higher strike.
- Sell one put at a lower strike, same expiry.
Context
Used when you expect a moderate decline and want a cheaper, defined-risk alternative to a bare long put.
Risk Profile
Maximum loss is the net debit paid. Maximum gain is the difference between strikes minus that debit, reached once the underlying is at or below the lower strike.
Pros
- Costs less than an outright long put.
- Defined, capped risk.
- Less exposed to a drop in implied volatility than a bare long put.
Cons
- Gain is capped even if the underlying falls hard.
- Still needs the underlying to clear the higher strike less net debit to profit.
Effect of Time
Time decay is muted compared to a single long put, since the short put's decay partially offsets the long put's decay.
Effect of Volatility
The spread's net vega is small; a change in implied volatility has a limited effect since both legs move together.
Look-Alike Strategies
Live Structure
| Position? | Right? | Ratio | Strike | Expiry | IV? | Premium? | Fill Price? | Liquidity? | Est. Fee? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long | Put | 1 | $76000.0000 | 20 Nov 2026 | 38.2% | $2474.4793 | $2511.9714 | 2.1000 | $22.4953 |
| Short | Put | 1 | $74000.0000 | 20 Nov 2026 | 39.2% | $1499.7218 | $1462.2288 | 118.9000 | $22.4958 |
Net cost, breakevens, the payoff chart and the scenario table are after costs: every leg filled by crossing the spread, estimated fees included -- the same numbers the Scanner ranks by.
Estimated Cost to Assemble
An estimate of what entering this structure right now would really cost: filling every leg by crossing the spread (the ask when buying, the bid when selling) instead of at the mid-price, plus an estimated exchange fee. Real fees and fills can differ from this estimate.
Compare venues
These exact contracts -- same strikes, expiries and ratios -- on every venue BOSS tracks for this currency, at execution: what selling (bid) or buying (ask) each leg there comes to, after that venue's own fee. Green marks the best venue for each leg and for the whole structure.
| Deribit this page | Bybit | OKX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Index? | $74860.3600 | $74952.0646 | $74864.4000 |
| Mid-Price Cost | $974.7575 | $950.0000 | $956.2228 |
| Slippage? | +$74.9852 | +$10.0000 | +$56.2484 |
| Estimated Fees? | +$44.9911 | +$45.1115 | +$44.9987 |
| Total Estimated Cost | $1094.7337 | $1005.1115$89.6200 better than this page | $1057.4699$37.2600 better than this page |
| Max Profit? | $905.2663 | $994.8885 | $942.5301 |
| Max Loss? | -$1094.7337 | -$1005.1115 | -$1057.4699 |
| Breakeven(s)? | $74905.2663 | $74994.8885 | $74942.5301 |
| Structure IV? | 38.7% | 38.0% | 38.5% |
| Open on this venue → | Open on this venue → |
Each leg: what it nets there per contract (fill price with the fee folded in), then the fill price, fee, IV and the size quoted at that price.
For comparing prices, not a recommendation: quotes move by the second, size is only what's shown at the top of the book, fees are each venue's published estimate, and the venues settle against different indexes and margin separately.
Market Context
This expiry as the Dashboard sees it: how the legs are priced against at-the-money and realized volatility, and where the expiry's forward sits against spot.
Volatility Smile?
Implied volatility across strikes at this expiry; the marked lines are this structure's strikes. Buying on the high part of the curve pays up for volatility; selling there collects it.
Leg bought Leg sold
Payoff & Greeks vs. Underlying Price
The Greeks curves are a Black-Scholes model using each leg's current implied volatility, holding time to expiry fixed -- not live exchange data at every price, which only exists at the current price (dashed line).
Payoff at Expiration
After costs At mid price
This structure's value and profit/loss at expiration, at a handful of specific prices: every leg's strike, every breakeven, the current spot, and the chart's own range.
| Underlying Price | Value at Expiration | Profit / Loss | Return on Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| $72000.0000 | $2000.0000 | $905.2663 | +82.7% |
| $74000.0000 | $2000.0000 | $905.2663 | +82.7% |
| $74905.2663 breakeven | $1094.7337 | $0.0000 | +0.0% |
| $74986.0900 current | $1013.9100 | -$80.8237 | -7.4% |
| $76000.0000 | $0.0000 | -$1094.7337 | -100.0% |
| $78000.0000 | $0.0000 | -$1094.7337 | -100.0% |
Delta (model)?
Gamma (model)?
Vega (model)?
Theta (model)?
Rho (model)?
Alternatives
From the Scanner's latest pass (21:35:48 UTC), priced at execution like everything above.
Same payoff through other strategies
| Strategy | Market | vs. this one | Credit/Debit | Max Profit? | Max Loss? | Prob. of Profit? | Max Profit / Max Loss? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear Call Spread74000/76000 | Bybit · BTC | $89.6174 | -$994.8837 | $994.8837 | -$1005.1163 | 50% | 0.99× |
| Bear Call Spread74000/76000 | OKX · BTC | $24.7022 | -$929.9685 | $929.9685 | -$1070.0315 | 51% | 0.87× |
| Bear Call Spread74000/76000 | Deribit · BTC | $24.6597 | -$929.9260 | $929.9260 | -$1070.0740 | 51% | 0.87× |
Other strikes and widths of this strategy
| Strategy | Market | vs. this one | Credit/Debit | Max Profit? | Max Loss? | Prob. of Profit? | Max Profit / Max Loss? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear Put Spread76000/80000 | Deribit · BTC | — | $3157.2297 | $842.7703 | -$3157.2297 | 66% | 0.27× |
| Bear Put Spread76000/78000 | Deribit · BTC | — | $1544.8989 | $455.1011 | -$1544.8989 | 63% | 0.29× |
| Bear Put Spread75000/81000 | Deribit · BTC | — | $4582.1352 | $1417.8648 | -$4582.1352 | 63% | 0.31× |